Middle Eastern View on the Event: Iran media airs 'murder confession'
Western View on the Event: Woman convicted of adultery, murder appears on Iranian TV
The first article speaks of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, an Iranian woman who, in collaboration with the man she had an affair with, killed her husband. This affair with Isa Taheri had leaked out to the public and Ashtiani was sentenced to death by stoning, before which however she admitted to the murder.
In an interview, Ashtiani states that she gave her husband an injection, which rendered him unconscious, then waited for Taheri to come to her house and kill her man through electrocution.
The article also states that Ashtiani had had two previous affairs for which she receives 99 lashes, but the conviction leading to death had been put on hold for her children’s sake.
The article from CNN however expresses a slightly different viewpoint. In this article, the reasons for Ashtiani’s conviction are also made clear, however it is also stated that her family ‘steadfastly denied that she played any role in her husband’s death’. To add on to this claim, a human rights organization called the reasons for the conviction a ‘theatrical melodrama’. The head of this organization, Hadi Ghaemi, stated that the public was looking for someone to speak guilty and that Ashtiani was the perfect target; that her death sentence is what Teheran wanted to hear. Ghaemi also states that ‘since the international outcry, the Iranian government is tap-dancing, trying to justify executing her.”
Both articles however agree on the fact that Ashtiani re-enacted the death of her husband for a video recording, as proof for her guilt. She did not resist to this. Both of these facts are unusual for Iranian trials, but the acting was supposed to promote the government’s position.
A fact that only the CNN article states is the 10 year prison sentence for her alleged cooperation in the plot to kill her husband.
In general, these two articles differ in their point of focus. The Middle Eastern article talks puts forward Ashtiani’s death much more, and what she has been convicted for, with what consequences.
The Western view on this story however is based much more on the human right perspective. It states that the convicting of Ashtiani is only a pretext to diverge interest in abolishing the stoning in Iran.
Overall: two perspectives, two intentions, two mindsets.

